Team representatives:
Pat Fry (Ferrari)
Andy Cowell (Mercedes)
Remi Taffin (Renault)
Paul Monaghan (Red Bull Racing)
Yasuhisa Arai (Honda)
Jonathan Neale (McLaren)
Q: Arai-san, if I can start with you please. Whatâs the current state of the Honda project? Is Honda on target with development?
Yasuhisa Arai:Â First of all, thank you very much to sit in centre. I am glad to be here again after Shanghai. Our progress is right now almost on schedule and I hope that in the year 2015, March we will make [a good start] together with our partner, get a good start on the grid.
Q: Would you like to run the power unit in a McLaren before the end of the year? Is that feasible? Are you allowed to do that?
YA:Â Everyone asks this to me! McLaren and Honda work together to design and create an experimental test vehicle to check the power unit system but unfortunately we donât have an actual test plan but I hope if possible we will drive just before next season.
Q: You canât say any more than âjust before next seasonâ?
YA:Â Just before next season. End of the season and next season, during that time. Thatâs my hope.
Q: What lessons have you learned from the efforts from the other power unit manufacturers? Are there particular areas that youâve noticed theyâve had troubled with?
YA:Â Iâve learned very small things because most of the data we donât know. So, very difficult to learn on the track.
Q: Youâve seen the failures that they have had. Are there particular areas you have concentrated on?
Jonathan Neale:Â If I may, just to help my partner here, as Arai-san says itâs very difficult at armâs length to focus on any particular area. Honda and McLaren have a lot of work to do together in a short period of time and Iâm sure if you were to ask – I donât want to put words in the mouth of either Andy or Remi here – but if you were to ask them what it felt like for them at this time of year before they were starting with the V6 engines, theyâll know what weâre going through at the moment.
Q: Thank you for that. If I can come to the back row now: a couple of questions for all of you. First of all, what is your state of development at this stage for 2015 with your engines? Remi, if I can start with you?
Remi Taffin:Â Itâs all about on plan. Itâs basically now a few months we are working on that and we now have got a few examples on the dyno, so itâs a work in process. I think we are going in the right direction. Itâs always difficult to know if weâll hit all our targets but thatâs where we are at the minute.
Q: Andy?
Andy Cowell:Â Weâve been doing lots of development ever since we froze the specification of this yearâs engine in February, so weâve been doing lots of development on research engines and using this yearâs engine as a prove-out but our final specification of engine wonât be complete until the early part of next year, because for all of us weâre in the development phase until the.
Q: Thank you. And Pat?
Pat Fry:Â Our development is very similar to Andyâs really. As soon as the engine was frozen weâve obviously been developing as hard as we can and trying to improve the power unit in all areas. There is a huge amount for us still to do. Very little of next yearâs spec engine actually exists, which I expect to be the same for everyone here. It will all finally be coming together at the start of January.
Q: Can I ask you your feelings about unfreezing in-season power unit development and where is that discussion actually going? Remi?
RT:Â Where is that discussion? I think at the moment it is at the upper level than the one we are here and what I think about it, or what Renault thinks, is that it is not going to really change the way we are working. As Andy says we are developing our engine for next. There wonât be many parts that will be looking like the one from this year. Whether we will be able to put all the parts, all the development into one engine for Melbourne is difficult to say. Of course we will push as much as we can, because the more we put for the first race, the more performance we will get for the whole season. If weâve got a slot at some point in the season to introduce some more development, they will be on the shelf, because obviously we just keep on working all through the year. Itâs not really decisive in how we achieve our development. We will just take the opportunity if it is there.
Q: What are your feelings about this Andy?
AC:Â I think it would be a change to the way we are structured. We froze the performance specification of this engine in January/February of this year and started working on a 12-month development programme and if youâve got one introduction point or two introduction points, it is a change. And often it is the prove-out – taking that performance specification into something that is reliable enough to do five race weekends – thatâs the costly aspect, because youâve got to have several sets of bits and often you have to go back around, because fatigue failures occur and youâve got to redesign and go again. The regulations were put together several years ago with the opportunity to do an annual performance update. If we change to a mid-season as well as a start-of-season update, we all just need to consider that carefully. I think we all acknowledge that it would affect the financial situation. Perhaps the engineering directors would love the opportunity but the finance directors would have a furrowed brow at the thought of doing it. It needs to be discussed and considered carefully.
Q: Pat, what does Ferrari think of this?
PF:Â I think we are continually developing all through the year. Itâs not like weâre targeting a fixed point, weâre developing as quickly as we can in every single area – some parts of that will be ready in January and some might not. But even then we donât stop, weâll carry on developing all through the following year. I think the changes that are being discussed still stay within the technical regulations and the number of tokens that you are allowed – itâs exactly the same number – it just gives you the opportunity to upgrade in one extra point, mid-season. I think for us the cost implications are not huge. As I said we would be doing all that development work anyway and also trying to improve the reliability of bits, so it doesnât make a huge difference for us from that point of view.
Q: Jonathan, weâve heard the state of the engine development for next year. Whatâs the state of the chassis development?
JN:Â Well, as Arai-san has said, weâve been developing an experimental vehicle to support the engine and transmission integration. We continue to develop the car on the circuit this year, aerodynamically. And while we are not comfortable with where weâre at, weâre much more confident about the direction in which weâre taking the team and the progress that weâre seeing on the track. The gap to Mercedes still looks pretty eye-watering at times, so weâve got a lot of work to do. The changes that Eric and I have made to the organisation, Iâm happy that thatâs going in the right direction. Weâve just got to get out heads down now and get on with it now. Itâs going the right way.
Q: Weâd remember in the past McLaren and Honda would be pounding around here for weeks on end⌠not possible these days.
JN:Â Well the world has changed a bit since that time, not least of which the engine regulations, chassis regulations, aerodynamic restrictions – itâs an energy-constrained series. All of these things, I think, have been good for the sport. They have their challenges, the rate of development, or the rate of aerodynamic development has definitely been restricted by the amount of wind tunnel time thatâs available – not so sure that thatâs actually restricted the amount of aerodynamic cost because the reality is that a unit of time in capacity is worth so much more at the moment but thatâs probably a wider discussion – but we are very optimistic that the steps weâre taking in the organisation are the right ones and we will be a competitive team.
Q: And finally – and Iâm sure youâre expecting this one – when are going to hear about the drivers? What are the criteria for choosing the drivers for next year?
JN:Â Thatâs a really interesting question and I think it depends on who you ask. Iâll give you my view. We have two very good drivers in the car who have been working incredibly hard this year, not always with the easiest car but with an improving car nonetheless. Having a world champion in the team is fantastic from a development and a confidence part of view, and having the Viking charger is also a joy to work with and good for us. In terms of setting our stall out for the future, then in our longer range, longer term conversations both with the shareholders and with our colleagues in Honda, then we have an eye on whatâs happening in two, three, four, five yearsâ time. Where does the team want to be? In the short term, I read the same magazines that you do. I look with interest and note that everybodyâs in contracts – but this is Formula One and anything can happen at a momentâs notice. Iâm never surprised by what Formula One will throw up.
Q: Paul, Sebastian in particular is on five units of certain parts of the engine. Is there any way you can manage that? Is there any way of managing how you take those penalties if thereâs going to be a penalty? He says thereâs going to be a penalty. How do you manage that?
Paul Monaghan:Â As carefully as you can, with the minimum damage to the teamâs performance. Obviously we have a few people breathing down our necks for second place in the Constructorsâ title, so we have to keep ourselves in a competitive situation. I think on a race-by-race basis we review where we are, what weâve got, how far we think we can take it? When is it least damaging to take any penalty? And weâll have to make that call in the near future.
Q: Unless it springs up on you beforehandâŚ
PM:Â Weâll deal with it if it does.
Q: You are entering into a much closer relationship with your engine manufacturer Renault. How is that coming along, what are the benefits of that?
PM:Â I think weâve always had a close relationship with Renault. Donât forget weâve got four Driversâ and Constructorsâ titles with them. I think a closer collaboration will only benefit both parties. So if we can bring some additional skill-sets to the party to complement those which Renault possess, weâll get a better package out of it, not just the power unit but its integration into the car, and ultimately our performance. Thatâs our aim, and thatâs what weâll do.
Q: How far advanced is that?
PM:Â Itâs taking shape at the moment and I think a few early projects are starting to bear fruit looking towards next year. We hope to pick up a few more and, as Remi said, when all the pieces come together, then weâll see how big a step we can make with it all.
QUESTIONS FROM THE FLOOR
Q: (Paolo Ianieri – La Gazzetta dello Sport) Arai-san, there are rumours today saying that Alonso has signed with McLaren-Honda. Can you confirm this, and if not, how desperate or hungry is Honda to have Alonso in its car next year?
YA:Â [to JN] Should I answer? McLaren-Honda know this idea, what driver should be used to drive our car. There is many rumours but my understanding that Formula One driver is just 22 drivers in the world. All of the drivers, I have great respect and so of course not only McLaren-Honda but also the other teams want to keep the good driver. Not only McLaren-Honda but also the team, everyone keeps the good driver. We donât decide yet.
Q: (Kaz Kawai – Fuji Television) Pat, weâve all heard that Steve Clark has won his job back. Do you have any idea when heâs coming back or have you been told by your boss when heâs coming back in?
PF:Â I think thatâs all being negotiated and sorted out at the moment, so Iâm sure weâll know in a few days.
Q: (Kate Walker – crash.net) Pat, weâve heard some stories today about the movement of technical staff from Red Bull, possibly moving to your team. Does this mean that Seb has signed for Ferrari as has been rumoured?
PF:Â Technical team… we have had a few people join in the recent months but in terms of drivers, itâs got no link to drivers whatsoever.
Q: (Sumie Dan – The Hochi Shimbun) Question for Arai-san: I understand that your new engine power target is over 600hp. Did you achieve this target now?
YA:Â Sorry, I never said the number of our target. Where did you get such kind of a number? But of course our target is very clear. This season, the Mercedes is top of top so next season we shall achieve that same competition or power. Everyone understands that and wants to exceed that power. Lots of work.
Q: (Dieter Rencken – Racing Lines) To Andy, Remy and Arai-san if he would like to comment as well: obviously any change to the engine freeze situation requires regulation change. Given Formula Oneâs present governance process, that means that the teams would actually be voting for that rather than the engine suppliers. How much of a frustration is it that your destiny is not ultimately in your own hands?
RT:Â Difficult to answer or difficult question, I donât know, but I will give one. Thatâs the way it is, as you say, thatâs the regulations so obviously we have to follow that, and again, as I said a bit earlier, itâs not going to be changing the way we are working so whether we are going to have a change or not, weâre just pushing like elves to try to get back to where we should be, so at the upper level and whatever we will get for next year… it will just be a plus, I would say, if we have this change. I would not say we are frustrated.
AC:Â Yeah, I would support Remyâs comments. Itâs not frustrating, thatâs how Formula One is set up and one of the great things about Formula One is that the boundary conditions do change and you do well if you can adapt quickly, if you can react quickly, change your organisation, not slow down but accelerate and make sure that youâre in a strong place. And thatâs what weâll do. So as soon as weâve got any change to the regulations, weâll all react, weâll all take the race on and weâll all see whoâs done the best job when we get to the first race.
Q: (Dieter Rencken – Racing Lines) Andy, I must come back to your comment earlier on that itâs got to be very carefully managed, any changes, and yet you wonât have any input into that process and thatâs really what Iâm getting at. How would you ensure that it is carefully managed?
AC:Â Youâre asked your opinion, so collectively weâve got lots of yearsâ experience developing engines, KERS systems, ERS systems and weâve all got a clear breakdown as to how many people weâve got, how much we spend on material, how loaded our dynos are so based on a different set of criteria, different set of regulations, we can all work out what the consequences are, what the opportunities are and do we want to take on those opportunities or not. So of course weâre all consulted on that and regulations are often a compromise, not everybody is completely happy but as soon as the regulations are clear and fixed, you react, you respond quickly, motivate the staff and you go racing into the first race with those regulations as weâve seen at the start of this year.
YA:Â Just a small comment: from the engineers and many fans, they and we want to keep the competition so in a season, to develop the many parts and to keep the competition is very important, just from engineering and fansâ side.
Q: (Kate Walker – crash.net) Arai-san, when you first announced your engine development programme, you said that there would be the possibility of supplying more than one customer team from 2016 onwards. Have you already entered into any negotiations or discussions with potential customers?
YA:Â Not yet, because no one knows of our potential. Of course, we prepare many cards but no one has checked my card.
Q: (Paolo Ianieri – La Gazzetta dello Sport) Mr Arai, what is your target for next year, realistically. What level do you think your power unit will be able to perform at and do you think that you have been doing enough at this stage, to convince a top driver to join your team?
YA:Â Our development progress is still on plan but we need to be careful to achieve top competition power within five months, so I need more time but finally our target, the McLaren-Honda target will be to keep a good position to compete in the championship. Thatâs our target.
Q: (Ken Kawakita – Weekly Playboy Magazine) Arai-san, weâve seen at the debut this year, a lot of engine manufacturers facing problems in testing as this whole system is so complicated and integration of the whole components is a colossal issue. And as far as weâve heard, you start properly testing from next year with only one partner. That means that the information and data that you can gather from that is quite limited. Do you think this could be a disadvantage for your engine programme? Do you have any concerns about this situation?
YA:Â I donât think so. Our partner is very strong and I think one of the best teams. Of course that means just one teamâs data, but maybe thatâs enough, I think. So we already discussed with our partner and set a target and already we have agreed whether the target is good or not. Then finally, maybe in March 2015 we will be in a good position.
Q: (Dieter Rencken – Racing Lines) Paul, obviously Adrian has started moving out and moving on within the group. What will the restructure look like? Who will be appointed in what positions, come next year?
PM:Â As I understand, a group of four will step into the void created by Adrianâs step-back. Thatâs Rob Marshall, Dan Fallows, Pierre Wache and myself. So we all get a dose more responsibility. Adrian hasnât left, he will still be involved in the F1 programme and thatâs how it will be divided up